Mail wins!
Why? email plays on the convenience of speed and cost.However, if the checks and balances were put to the test, I think that overall traditional mail would win. If you need to get a package delivered.. mailing it would probably be the only other way to get it from point A to B without a personal delivery. If for some reason all the servers and networks were scrambled, mail would be the sure thing. Old fashioned you say? Think technology back-up/slash/ flower delivery.
Why? email plays on the convenience of speed and cost.However, if the checks and balances were put to the test, I think that overall traditional mail would win. If you need to get a package delivered.. mailing it would probably be the only other way to get it from point A to B without a personal delivery. If for some reason all the servers and networks were scrambled, mail would be the sure thing. Old fashioned you say? Think technology back-up/slash/ flower delivery.
Email wins too.. in relation to speed, cost and we all know that most of our hand-writting has degraded in quality, thanks to the beautiful innovation of microsoft word. I hardly ever write out anything, and when I do, I limit myself to a few words (if that) and sign my name. In relation to speed, communication is enhanced, people would probably not send as many emails if they had to pay for it. Emails are a click away from sender -to receipient.
where does this leave the postal mail? well, they've had to increase their rates in a much more exponential way than in the anti-email era. They are forced to lay-off more people which in turn probably makes the whole process even slower. If FedEx or UPS are used for an overnight delivery, they charge anywhere from $20 -up, to deliver a document.!
its a tie... what email can't do, postal mail does. And what both can do, email does better!
No comments:
Post a Comment